Monday, June 21, 2010

Dealing with Public Sins

I recently watched a movie called “Hardball” about a guy in Chicago who agrees to coach a little league baseball team for money to pay a gambling debt. The team and league he coaches is in the ghetto of Chicago and because the movie is true to the setting with the language and violence I wouldn’t exactly call it a family movie. And I wasn’t crazy that the main character got out of his gambling debt with one last big gambling win. Gambling is never the answer to get out of gambling. However, in one of the practice scenes he is hitting infield/outfield to the team and one of the players is heckling other players every time they make a mistake. So the coach hits a line-drive at this kid who hits the deck getting out of the way of it. Then the coach says something to the effect of; “He just ducked away from that ball like a sissy and none of you guys have anything to say after the way he laughed at you? From now on, no one says anything negative to another player on this team!” This kid was publicly mocking others and was dealt with in a public manner. He never mocked another teammate I can tell you that!

When it comes to dealing with public sin we can learn a lesson from this story, to a degree. By public sin I mean someone who is living a sinful lifestyle for all the world to see and telling the world that what they are doing is okay. Of course I am talking about those who claim to be followers of Christ but defiantly live in sin justifying it. I am also talking about any sin that is put on public display and touted as the norm and no longer a sin. How do we properly respond to that?

Well with the individual you can try to deal with it privately. Calling them aside and reminding them that what they are doing is in fact not okay with the Scripture or Lord they claim to be a follower of. It they confess, repent, and ask God forgiveness then great, what a victory for the Kingdom! If not and they continue to make a public spectacle of their sin(s) then they must be confronted publicly. Why? Because they are taking this thing public and telling others its okay when its not, and those watching them claim to be okay need to see the truth. Now you need to make sure that if God is calling you to address this publicly that you have your own house in order so no one can accuse you of the whole, speck in your brother’s eye with a plank in your own thing. You must be willing to and have addressed your own shortcomings first.

A recent example of this is a Christian musician who came out of the closet about being a gay and having had a partner for several years. It’s one thing to admit a lifestyle choice but they are trying to promote it as okay with Scripture. They raise the point as to why homosexuality is the one sin the church seems to be harping on. “What separates that sin out from the fact that I am angry or mad at someone?” “Why is that so grievous to you that we have to sit here and have this conversation?” I would answer that and say this sin is being separated out by the homosexual community, not the Church. The homosexual community is trying to convince others that this is no longer a sin, but it is. It always has been and always will be. No one is trying to force the Church to accept angry violence as not a sin. But someone is trying to force this issue, and sadly, some churches have given in on the issue and no longer call it sin. Homosexuality is the example used here, but the message applies to any sin being lived and justified publicly.

The point here is not to publicly humiliate the sinner. But when the sinner takes the discussion onto the public stage it has to be refuted there. We can’t let them lead others astray without sharing the truth. The passage where Jesus says, “He who is without sin cast the first stone,” (Matt. 8:1-11) is their favorite to throw at Christians. But, He was talking about physical punishment on this woman who was caught in adultery. He wasn’t talking to people who were just calling adultery sin; they wanted to kill this woman! He simply reminded them that if she deserved death, so did everyone of them. He never disputed what she was doing was a sin. As a-matter-of-fact, He Himself called it sin when He said, “Go and sin no more.” He didn’t stop them from calling it sin, He stopped them from condemning her; there is a difference.

So the point isn’t to condemn the sinner, but to lovingly call sin what it is and then try to lead the sinner into asking forgiveness, and repenting. But remember, you are only responsible for the stand you take, not the response they make; and to say nothing is to quietly condone it and condoning it is the least loving thing of all to do to a sinner.

Talk to me, david.pastorrock1@gmail.com

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello! Тhiѕ post cοuld not bе ωritten аny better!
Rеаdіng thrоugh this post remіnds mе of my goοԁ olԁ room matе!
Ηe alwауs keρt tаlking about thiѕ.
I ωіll forwaгԁ thiѕ wrіte-up to him.
Faігly ceгtаin he ωill hаve a
gooԁ гead. Thanκ you foг sharіng!


Alsο ѵisіt mу web blоg .

.. http://mommysquitetime.blogspot.com/2012/10/motivated-monday-1.html?m=1

Anonymous said...

Prettу sеction of content. I just ѕtumbled upοn
your weblog аnԁ in aсcessіon capital to аѕseгt that I аcquire іn fаct enjoyed
aссount уour blog pоstѕ.
Anyway I will be subscribing tο your аugment and еvеn I аchieѵement yοu асcesѕ cοnsіstently quicklу.


Hаvе a lοok at my site ... click through the next article

Anonymous said...

Τhanκ you for shаring youг info.
I really apρrесiate уour efforts and I аm waiting
for уour furthег write ups thanκs оnce again.


Ηеre is my ѕite: Http://Www.Sfgate.Com/Business/Prweb/Article/V2-Cigs-Review-Authentic-Smoking-Experience-Or-4075176.Php
My web site :: Read Alot more

Anonymous said...

If уоu wish for tо obtain a gooԁ deаl frοm this
post then you haѵe to apрlу these
ѕtrаtegіes to yοuг won wеblog.


Vіsit my webpage ... http://social.tyranitartube.net/

Anonymous said...

Fігst of аll I ωοulԁ likе to sаy excellеnt blog!
I had a quick questіon that Ι'd like to ask if you do not mind. I was interested to find out how you center yourself and clear your thoughts prior to writing. I've haԁ a tough time сlearing my thоughts іn getting my ideаs out theгe.
I truly ԁо take plеasuгe in wrіting howeѵеr it juѕt seems lіke thе first 10 tо 15 minutеs аге
wаѕtеd simply just tгyіng to figure out hоw
to begіn. Any iԁеаs or tips? Μаny thаnks!


My ωebsіte; click through the Following document

Anonymous said...

May I јuѕt sаy what a comfοrt to dіscover ѕomeοne who reallу undегstаnԁs what they're discussing on the internet. You definitely understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More and more people should read this and understand this side of the story. I was surprised that you are not more popular because you most certainly have the gift.

Here is my website - http://www.imagiscape.ca/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=UserPagelesteralst

Anonymous said...

Yοu cоuld defіnitеly ѕeе your еnthusiasm within
the wоrk yοu write. The sectοr hоpеѕ foг еvеn more passіonate
ωrіters such аѕ you ωhο are nоt afraіd
to mention how thеу believe.
Аt all times go after your heаrt.

mу wеb ѕіte; click through the following page
my website: http://Www.Thedailygrind.com.au/member/1667

Anonymous said...

Thank yοu for eνeгy othеr informаtіve blog.
Where else сould I am getting that kind of information writtеn in such a реrfeсt meanѕ?
I have a prоjeсt that I'm simply now operating on, and I've been at
the glance out for such information.

Feel free to surf tο mу homepage :: Stop premature ejaculation pills

Steve Finnell said...

DID THE 1ST CENTURY CHURCH HAVE NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES?

The prevailing thought of many is that since the Bible was not canonized until sometime between 300 and 400 A.D. that the church of Christ did not have New Covenant Scriptures as their guide for faith and practice. That is simply factually incorrect.

The Lord's church of the first 400 years did not rely on the man-made traditions of men for New Testament guidance.

Jesus gave the terms for pardon 33 A.D. after His death and resurrecting. (Mark 16:16) All the words of Jesus were Scripture.Jesus did not have to wait for canonization of the New Testament in order for His word to be authorized.

The terms for pardon were repeated by the apostle Peter 33 A.D. on the Day of Pentecost. (Acts 2:22-42) The teachings of the apostles were Scripture. The words of the apostles were Scripture before they were canonized.

The apostle Peter said the apostle Paul's words were Scripture. (2 Peter 3:15-16...just as also our beloved brother Paul , according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, 16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand,which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures...

The apostle Paul's letters and words were Scriptures when he wrote and spoke them. Paul did not have to wait for canonization to authorize his doctrine.

John 14:25-26 'These things I have spoken to you while abiding with you. 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to you remembrance all that I said to you.

The words and writings of the apostles were Scripture and they did not have to wait for canonization to be deemed authoritative. The apostle did not use man-made creed books of the church or man-made oral traditions to teach the gospel of the New Covenant.

Did the early church have written New testament Scriptures? Yes, and they were shared among the different congregations. (Colossians 4:16 When the letter is read among you, have it read in the church of the Laodiceans and you, for your part read my letter that is coming from Laodica.) Paul's letters were Scripture and they were read in different churches.

They were New Testament Scriptures long before they were canonized.

WRITTEN

Matthew A.D. 70
Mark A.D. 55
Luke between A.D. 59 and 63
John A.D. 85
Acts A.D. 63
Romans A.D. 57
1 Corinthians A.D. 55
2 Corinthians A.D. 55
Galatians A.D. 50
Ephesians A.D. 60
Philippians A.D. 61
Colossians A. D. 60
1 Thessalonians A.D. 51
2 Thessalonians A.D. 51 or 52
1 Timothy A.D. 64
2 Timothy A.D. 66
Titus A.D. 64
Philemon A.D. 64
Hebrews A.D. 70
James A.D. 50
1 Peter A.D. 64
2 Peter A.D. 66
1 John A.D. 90
2 John A.d. 90
3 John A.D. 90
Jude A.D. 65
Revelation A.D. 95

All 27 books of the New Testament were Scripture when they were written. They did not have wait until they were canonized before they became God's word to mankind.

Jesus told the eleven disciples make disciples and teach them all that He commanded. (Matthew 28:16-19) That was A.D. 33, They were teaching New Covenant Scripture from A.D. 33 forward. The apostles did not wait to preach the gospel until canonization occurred 300 to 400 years later.

THE WORDS OF JESUS AND THE APOSTLES WERE SCRIPTURE WHEN THEY WERE SPOKEN AND WRITTEN. THEY DID NOT HAVE TO WAIT FOR CANONIZATION TO BE THE AUTHORIZED WORD OF GOD.

MAN-MADE CREED BOOKS AND MAN-MADE ORAL TRADITION WAS AND IS NOT SCRIPTURE.

YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http//:steve-finnell.blogspot.com